Could Julian Assange Be on Brink of Freedom?

A London court will rule on Tuesday whether it would be in the interests of justice to pursue action against WikiLeaks’ founder Julian Assange for failing to surrender to bail back in 2012.

If the judge rules in his favor, then Assange, 46, would be free to leave the Ecuadorean Embassy in London where he has been holed up for more than five years.

However, he might still elect to remain in the embassy, where he has been granted political asylum, because he fears Britain would arrest him under a U.S. extradition warrant, the existence of which has neither been confirmed nor denied.

Who is Julian Assange?

Assange was born in Townsville, Australia, in July 1971, to parents who were involved in theater and traveled frequently.

In his teens, Assange gained a reputation as a sophisticated computer programmer and in 1995 he was arrested and pleaded guilty to hacking. He was fined, but avoided prison on condition he did not reoffend.

In his late 20s, he went to Melbourne University to study mathematics and physics.

Wikileaks

Assange launched WikiLeaks in 2006, creating a web-based “dead letter drop” for would-be leakers. It says it is a non-profit organization funded by human rights campaigners, journalists and the general public, with the aim of fighting government and corporate corruption.

The website rose to prominence in April 2010 when it published a classified video showing a 2007 U.S. helicopter attack that killed a dozen people in the Iraqi capital, Baghdad, including two Reuters news staff.

In July that year, it released more than 90,000 classified U.S. military documents on the war in Afghanistan and then in October, it published about 400,000 more secret U.S. files on the Iraq war. The two leaks represented the largest security breaches of their kind in U.S. military history.

It followed these up with the release of 250,000 secret diplomatic cables from U.S. embassies around the world, with some of the information published by newspapers such as the New York Times and Britain’s Guardian.

The leaks angered and embarrassed U.S. politicians and military officials, who said the unauthorized dissemination would put lives at risk, and drew similar condemnation from U.S. allies such as Britain.

Arrest in 2010

On Nov. 18, 2010, a Swedish court ordered Assange’s detention as a result of an investigation into allegations of sex crimes.

He had spent much of the year in Sweden and the accusations of misconduct were made by two female Swedish WikiLeaks volunteers. On Dec. 7, 2010, Assange was arrested by British police on a European Arrest Warrant (EAW) issued by Sweden.

Assange denied the allegations and was eventually granted bail on Dec. 16. He said from the outset that he believed the Swedish case was a pretext to extradite him to the United States to face charges over the WikiLeaks releases.

His extradition to Sweden for questioning was ordered in Feb. 2011.

Subsequent appeals failed and an order for his surrender was issued for June 29, 2012. On June 19, he entered the Ecuadorean Embassy in the upmarket Knightsbridge area of London seeking asylum.

Ten days later a judge at London’s Westminster Magistrates’ Court issued a warrant for his arrest.

Ecuadorean Embassy

Ecuador granted Assange asylum on Aug. 16, 2012 and at the time he said he expected to wait six months to a year for a deal which would allow him to leave the embassy. British police mounted a round-the-clock guard to prevent his escape, saying he would be arrested should he leave.

The impasse left Assange living in cramped quarters in the embassy with no political or legal solution to the saga in sight. A United Nations panel said in Feb. 2016 that Assange had been arbitrarily detained. Britain called that description “ridiculous”, saying his detention was voluntary.

British police ended their permanent guard in October 2015, having spent an estimated 12.6 million pounds, but said they would maintain “covert tactics” to arrest him if he left the embassy.

Swedish Case Dropped

On Nov. 14, 2016, Swedish prosecutors questioned Assange at the embassy in London about the alleged sex crimes for about four hours.

Swedish prosecutors announced on May 19, 2017, that they had dropped their investigation and withdrawn their EAW. However, British police said he would still be arrested if he left the embassy because there was an outstanding warrant for failing to surrender to bail.

In January this year, Ecuador granted Assange citizenship after Britain refused a request for him to be given diplomatic status, saying he would face justice if he left the embassy.

New Court Challenge

On Jan. 26, Assange’s lawyers asked London’s Westminster Magistrates Court to drop the arrest warrant against him because it no longer applied as Sweden’s EAW had been withdrawn.

They said Assange and his guarantors had forfeited more than 110,000 pounds ($156,000) when he failed to surrender and he had already spent 5-1/2 years in conditions which were “akin to imprisonment.”

Last Tuesday, Judge Emma Arbuthnot rejected his bid to have the warrant withdrawn. However, she then agreed to consider whether, even if Assange were arrested and brought to court, it would actually be in the interests of justice to take any further action against him.

Her ruling will be made on Tuesday and if he is successful, it would mean there was no public, legal case in Britain against him.

U.S. Criminal Investigation

During his successful election campaign, U.S. President Donald Trump praised Assange’s organization for releasing hacked emails from Democratic National Committee (DNC) computers, telling a rally in Oct. 2016 “I love WikiLeaks.”

There is no public record or evidence demonstrating any U.S. criminal charges are pending against Assange. When Barack Obama was president, the U.S. Justice Department leadership concluded it would be inappropriate to prosecute WikiLeaks because it was too similar to a media organization.

However in March last year, U.S. federal prosecutors in Alexandria, Virginia, expanded a long-running grand jury investigation into WikiLeaks and its personnel including Assange. A Justice Department official recently confirmed to Reuters this investigation was still open.

Last April, CIA Director Mike Pompeo described WikiLeaks as a “hostile intelligence service” abetted by states such as Russia, who had used it to distribute hacked material from DNC computers during the 2016 presidential election. He also called Assange a “fraud” and a “coward.”

Assange and his supporters believe that U.S. prosecutors have a sealed, therefore secret, indictment against him. They also suspect that Britain has received a U.S. extradition warrant linked to these charges and that he would be arrested by British police were he to leave the embassy.

They hope if his court case is successful, it will put pressure on the British authorities to disclose what, if any, U.S. efforts are in place to prosecute him.

Opioid Makers Gave $10 Million to Advocacy Groups Amid Epidemic

Companies selling some of the most lucrative prescription painkillers funneled millions of dollars to advocacy groups that in turn promoted the medications’ use, according to a report released Monday by a U.S. senator.

The investigation by Missouri’s Senator Claire McCaskill sheds light on the opioid industry’s ability to shape public opinion and raises questions about its role in an overdose epidemic that has claimed hundreds of thousands of American lives. Representatives of some of the drugmakers named in the report said they did not set conditions on how the money was to be spent or force the groups to advocate for their painkillers.

The report from McCaskill, ranking Democrat on the Senate’s homeland security committee, examines advocacy funding by the makers of the top five opioid painkillers by worldwide sales in 2015. Financial information the companies provided to Senate staff shows they spent more than $10 million between 2012 and 2017 to support 14 advocacy groups and affiliated doctors.

The report did not include some of the largest and most politically active manufacturers of the drugs.

The findings follow a similar investigation launched in 2012 by a bipartisan pair of senators. That effort eventually was shelved and no findings were ever released.

While the new report provides only a snapshot of company activities, experts said it gives insight into how industry-funded groups fueled demand for drugs such as OxyContin and Vicodin, addictive medications that generated billions in sales despite research showing they are largely ineffective for chronic pain.

‘Pretty damning’

“It looks pretty damning when these groups were pushing the message about how wonderful opioids are and they were being heavily funded, in the millions of dollars, by the manufacturers of those drugs,” said Lewis Nelson, a Rutgers University doctor and opioid expert.

The findings could bolster hundreds of lawsuits that are aimed at holding opioid drugmakers responsible for helping fuel an epidemic blamed for the deaths of more than 340,000 Americans since 2000.

McCaskill’s staff asked drugmakers to turn over records of payments they made to groups and affiliated physicians, part of a broader investigation by the senator into the opioid crisis. The request was sent last year to five companies: Purdue Pharma; Insys Therapeutics; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, owned by Johnson & Johnson; Mylan; and Depomed.

Fourteen nonprofit groups, mostly representing pain patients and specialists, received nearly $9 million from the drugmakers, according to investigators. Doctors affiliated with those groups received another $1.6 million.

Most of the groups included in the probe took industry-friendly positions. That included issuing medical guidelines promoting opioids for chronic pain, lobbying to defeat or include exceptions to state limits on opioid prescribing, and criticizing landmark prescribing guidelines from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“Doctors and the public have no way of knowing the true source of this information and that’s why we have to take steps to provide transparency,” said McCaskill in an interview with The Associated Press. The senator plans to introduce legislation requiring increased disclosure about the financial relationships between drugmakers and certain advocacy groups.

‘Front groups’

A 2016 investigation by the AP and the Center for Public Integrity revealed how painkiller manufacturers used hundreds of lobbyists and millions in campaign contributions to fight state and federal measures aimed at stemming the tide of prescription opioids, often enlisting help from advocacy organizations.

Bob Twillman, executive director of the Academy of Integrative Pain Management, said most of the $1.3 million his group received from the five companies went to a state policy advocacy operation. But Twillman said the organization has called for non-opioid pain treatments while also asking state lawmakers for exceptions to restrictions on the length of opioid prescriptions for certain patients.

“We really don’t take direction from them about what we advocate for,” Twillman said of the industry.

The tactics highlighted in Monday’s report are at the heart of lawsuits filed by hundreds of state and local governments against the opioid industry.

The suits allege that drugmakers misled doctors and patients about the risks of opioids by enlisting “front groups” and “key opinion leaders” who oversold the drugs’ benefits and encouraged overprescribing. In the legal claims, the governments seek money and changes to how the industry operates, including an end to the use of outside groups to push their drugs.

U.S. deaths linked to opioids have quadrupled since 2000 to roughly 42,000 in 2016. Although initially driven by prescription drugs, most opioid deaths now involve illicit drugs, including heroin and fentanyl.

Companies and their contributions

Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin, contributed the most to the groups, funneling $4.7 million to organizations and physicians from 2012 through last year.

In a statement, the company did not address whether it was trying to influence the positions of the groups it supported, but said it does help organizations “that are interested in helping patients receive appropriate care.” On Friday, Purdue announced it would no longer market OxyContin to doctors.

Insys Therapeutics, a company recently targeted by federal prosecutors, provided more than $3.5 million to interest groups and physicians, according to McCaskill’s report. Last year, the company’s founder was indicted for allegedly offering bribes to doctors to write prescriptions for the company’s spray-based fentanyl medication.

A company spokesman declined to comment.

Insys contributed $2.5 million last year to a U.S. Pain Foundation program to pay for pain drugs for cancer patients.

“The question was: Do we make these people suffer, or do we work with this company that has a terrible name?” said U.S. Pain founder Paul Gileno, explaining why his organization sought the money.

Depomed, Janssen and Mylan contributed $1.4 million, $650,000 and $26,000 in payments, respectively. Janssen and Mylan told the AP they acted responsibly, while calls and emails to Depomed were not returned.

Клімкін: внесок України в боротьбу з «ІД» «гідний»

Міністр закордонних справ України Павло Клімкін заявляє, що внесок України у глобальну боротьбу проти екстремістського угруповання «Ісламська держава» «скромніший, ніж міг би бути», через агресію Росії, але «гідний».

13 лютого Клімкін братиме участь у черговому засіданні міністрів закордонних справ Глобальної коаліції з боротьби проти «Ісламської держави» в Кувейті.

За повідомленням МЗС України, у засіданні візьмуть участь представники понад 70 держав, зокрема, Великої Британії, США, Канади, Італії, Японії, Франції, ФРН, а також відповідних міжнародних організацій (НАТО, Інтерпол).

Засідання коаліції відбудеться під співголовуванням віце-прем’єр-міністра, міністра закордонних справ Кувейту Шейха Сабаха Халіда Аль-Хамада Аль-Сабаха і державного секретаря США Рекса Тіллерсона.

Засідання покликане скоординувати зусилля держав-учасниць у протистоянні терористичній загрозі не тільки в Сирії й Іраку, але й в усьому світі, а також обговорити шляхи подолання наслідків злочинної діяльності «ІД», наголосили в МЗС.

Антитерористична коаліція на чолі зі США почала операцію проти угруповання «Ісламська держава» в 2014 році. Коаліція нараховує 74 члени, включно з НАТО, Лігою арабських держав, Європейським союзом та Інтерполом.

У листопаді 2017 року спеціальний представник президента США в коаліції Бретт Макгарк заявив, що з моменту її створення бойовики «Ісламської держави» втратили 95% території, яку вони раніше контролювали.

У грудні прем’єр-міністр Іраку Хайдер аль-Абаді повідомив, що війна його країни проти бойовиків «Ісламської держави» успішно завершена.

 

US Charges 5 Ex-Venezuelan Officials in PDVSA Bribe Case

U.S. prosecutors on Monday announced charges against five former Venezuelan officials accused of soliciting bribes in exchange for helping vendors win favorable treatment from state oil company PDVSA, the latest case to stem from a $1 billion graft probe.

The indictment by the U.S. Justice Department was filed in federal court in Houston, Texas, and was made public after Spain on Friday extradited one of the former officials, Cesar Rincon, who was a general manager at PDVSA’s, procurement unit Bariven.

Others charged included Nervis Villalobos, a former Venezuelan vice minister of energy; Rafael Reiter, who worked as PDVSA’s head of security and loss prevention; and Luis Carlos de Leon, a former official at a state-run electric company.

Those three like Rincon were arrested in Spain in October at the request of U.S. authorities amid a foreign bribery investigation into the financially struggling PDVSA, or Petroleos de Venezuela SA.

De Leon, Villalobos and Reiter remain in Spanish custody.

The indictment also charged Alejandro Isturiz Chiesa, who was an assistant to Bariven’s president and remains at large.

All five face conspiracy and money laundering charges. De Leon and Villalobos were also charged with conspiring to violate the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.

Fred Schwartz, a lawyer for Rincon, said he expected his 50-year-old client would plead not guilty when he is arraigned on March 6. Lawyers for the other defendants could not be immediately identified.

The case flowed out of a U.S. investigation into what prosecutors have previously called a $1 billion bribery plot involving payments to PDVSA officials that became public with the arrest of two businessmen in 2015.

The indictment announced on Monday said that from 2011 to 2013, the five Venezuelans sought bribes and kickbacks from vendors in exchange for helping them secure PDVSA contracts and gain priority over other vendors for outstanding invoices during its liquidity crisis.

The indictment said the five Venezuelans then used various companies and bank accounts in Switzerland, Curaçao and elsewhere to launder the money they received.

Among the vendors that they promised to help in exchange for bribes were Roberto Rincon, who was president of Tradequip Services & Marine, and Abraham Jose Shiera Bastidas, the manager of Vertix Instrumentos, the indictment said.

Both pleaded guilty in 2016 to conspiring to pay bribes to secure energy contracts. Eight other people have also pleaded guilty in connection with the U.S. investigation.

Putin Meets Palestinian Leader, Conveys Greetings From Trump

President Vladimir Putin on Monday passed greetings from U.S. President Donald Trump to the visiting Palestinian leader, who responded that he doesn’t want to  cooperate with Washington following its decision to recognize Jerusalem as the Israeli capital.

Speaking at the start of their meeting in the Kremlin, Putin told Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas that he was just off the phone with Trump. 

“Naturally, we spoke about the Palestinian-Israeli settlement,” he said “I would like to convey to you his best wishes.”

Abbas responded that the Palestinians don’t want to cooperate with the United States as a sponsor of the peace process, but welcome multilateral cooperation.

Trump honored a campaign promise in December by recognizing Jerusalem as Israel’s capital and vowing to relocate the U.S. Embassy there. 

The move outraged Palestinians and others across the Muslim world. Palestinian leaders have said it means that Washington can no longer serve as a Mideast peace broker.

“We refuse to cooperate with the Americans as co-sponsors,” Abbas told Putin in remarks carried by Russian news agencies. “President Trump again surprised us. His decision to move the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem and consider Jerusalem the capital of Israel was like a slap in our face.”

Саакашвілі про видворення до Польщі: це було викрадення

Колишній президент Грузії, лідер «Руху нових сил» Міхеїл Саакашвілі назвав своє видворення до Польщі «викраденням». Розмову з політиком оприлюднив журналіст польського радіо RMF FM Патрик Михальський у Twitter.  

«Я зроблю заяву завтра. Мене дуже добре зустріла польська сторона. Українська сторона була абсолютно жорстокою. Це було незаконне викрадення», – заявив Саакашвілі.

Він додав, що любить Польщу, але його «битва – в Україні й Грузії».

Також Саакашвілі телефоном з Варшави повідомив про обставини свого затримання.

«У кафе увірвались, посадили в бус. Вони намагались закрити мені очі, зав’язати руки. Посадили у машину, яка довго кружляла по Києву. Висадили в «Борисполі», потім підігнали літак, скрутили руки й грубо посадили на нього», – сказав політик.

12 лютого соратники Саакашвілі заявили про його затримання невідомими в центрі Києва. У СБУ, Генпрокуратурі і поліції Радіо Свобода повідомили, що Саакашвілі не затримували.

Згодом Державна прикордонна служба заявила, що Міхеїла Саакашвілі повернули до країни, звідки він «прибув, порушуючи українське законодавство».

Пізніше польська прикордонна служба повідомила, що Саакашвілі прийняли на території Польщі.

У липні 2017 року Міхеїл Саакашвілі указом президента України втратив українське громадянство. Чинність його закордонного паспорта громадянина України після втрати громадянства скасована.

Саакашвілі 10 вересня 2017 року потрапив на територію України, не пройшовши прикордонного контролю. У вересні суд визнав Саакашвілі винним у незаконному перетині кордону України. Крім того, суд відмовив Саакашвілі у позовних вимогах до державної міграційної служби у визнанні його біженцем.

Проти Саакашвілі порушена низка кримінальних справ у його рідній Грузії, яка вже тривалий час домагається від України його видачі.

Росія тримає 600 танків на сході України – Порошенко

Президент України Петро Порошенко заявляє, що значна військова присутність Росії на сході України може в будь-який момент призвести до загострення ситуації.

«У Путіна в Україні стільки армії, що він у будь-який момент може сприяти загостренню становища, якщо йому заманеться. Я одного разу розповідав канцлеру Меркель: Ви можете собі уявити, що на сході Україні наразі перебуває більше танків, аніж є в наявності у Бундесверу? На цій невеликій території розташовано 600 танків», – сказав Петро Порошенко в інтерв’ю німецькому виданню Bild, яке цитує прес-служба глави держави.

Президент України подякував канцлеру Німеччини Анґелі Меркель за допомогу в укладенні Мінських угод. Водночас він наголосив: «Однак, як знає весь світ: президент Росії не дотримується взятих на себе обіцянок. Завжди, коли він хоче, він сприяє черговій ескалації».

Збройний конфлікт на Донбасі триває від 2014 року після російської анексії Криму. Україна і Захід звинувачують Росію у збройній підтримці сепаратистів. Кремль відкидає ці звинувачення і заявляє, що на Донбасі можуть перебувати хіба що російські «добровольці». За даними ООН, за час конфлікту загинули понад 10 300 людей.

Другі Мінські угоди були підписані 12 лютого 2015 року. Цей документ повинен був змусити сторони конфлікту на Донбасі виконувати так званий «Мінськ-1» – домовленості, укладені у вересні 2014 року. Передбачалося, що другі мирні домовленості зможуть повністю врегулювати ситуацію до кінця 2015 року, однак жоден із 13 пунктів повністю так і не виконали, а припинення вогню та відведення зброї відбулося лише частково, зазначають як сторони конфлікту, так і незалежні спостерігачі.

Росія заявляє, що є лише «гарантом» виконання Мінських домовленостей.

Активісти оприлюднили відеореконструкцію підготовки штурму Майдану

Вбивство чотирьох правоохоронців у центрі Києва в лютому 2014 року сталося після того, як протестувальників витіснили до майдану Незалежності, під час протестних акцій на вулиці Інститутській і Грушевського жоден правоохоронець не загинув, заявляють учасники Jus Talionis Reconstruction Lab, які зробили відеореконструкцію штурму Майдану 18 лютого 2014 року.

«Двоє правоохоронців загинули біля будівлі Альфа-Банку у напрямку наступу з боку Хрещатика о 16:20-16:25. Всі майданівці у цьому напрямку були відтиснуті за барикади о 16:13-16:15. Інші двоє правоохоронців загинули від 17-ї до 18-ї години на майданчику біля Жовтневого палацу. Станом на 17:26 співвідношення вбитих мітингувальників і силовиків за увесь час протестних акцій становило 15 до 4-х (спочатку 15 майданівців – і вже після них 4 правоохоронці). Це сталося саме тоді, коли активні дії з боку силовиків та майданівців припинилися, а СБУ і МВС оголосило до 18:00 ультиматум Майдану», – зазначили у Jus Talionis Reconstruction Lab.

Членам лабораторії вдалося встановити ресурси, які влада залучила для підготовки і проведення штурму Майдану.

«На відео ми змогли зафіксувати: частини внутрішніх військ МВС; «Беркут» із більшості областей України; штурмові спецпідрозділи СБУ і МВС («Альфа», «Омега», рота спецпризначення ПМОП «Беркут» («Чорна рота Садовника») та інші); три БТР; не менше трьох водометів й інші автомобілі силових структур; Департамент карного розшуку; Управління по боротьбі з організованою злочинністю; Управління державної охорони; Державтоінспекція; муніципальні служби разом з технікою; Київський метрополітен; Укрчастотнагляд; сотні «тітушок»», ‒ розповіли в Jus Talionis Reconstruction Lab..

На відеореконструкції можна побачити, що «спецоперація» анонсована на 18:00, не почалася в зазначений термін. Лише о 18:17 до Європейської площі прибуває перший озброєний автоматичною зброєю загін спецпризначенців, вслід за ним – значно більший.

«Від 18:36:22 до 18:39:00 із вулиці Трьохсвятительської прибуває кортеж із 33 автоодиниць. Це переважно мікроавтобуси, кілька позашляховиків й один автобус «Богдан». Більшість людей ‒ озброєна. За нашими підрахунками їх було близько 200 осіб», ‒ розповіли в Jus Talionis Reconstruction Lab.

Для проведення спецоперації силовики залучили й окремих представників цивільного населення, стверджують дослідники.

«Від 18:30 до 18:32, перебазовуючись із Маріїнського парку ближче до місця майбутнього штурму, проходить численна група «тітушок»: о 18:30 вона йде крізь прохід у барикаді на вулиці Грушевського, о 18:31 виходить на Європейську площу, о 18:32 проходить повз готель «Дніпро». Пізніше декілька таких груп опинились на перехресті вулиць Великої Житомирської і Володимирської, де були вбиті Васільцов В.В. і Веремій В.В.», – заявляють активісти.

На відео також зафіксовано, що о 19:27 силовики здійснили перші спроби прибрати розмежувальну сітку лінії протистояння для атаки БТРу. Зробити це вручну їм не вдалося. Тому о 19:41 та 19:44 сітку двічі пробивала вантажівка правоохоронців. О 19:50 почався штурм Майдану.

21 листопада 2013 року в Україні почалися акції протесту, відомі як Євромайдан, які згодом назвали Революцією гідності. За даними Генпрокуратури, під час Майдану постраждали понад дві тисячі людей, 104 з них загинули. Найбільше активістів загинуло у лютому 2014 року. Зокрема 18 лютого загинуло 24 протестувальників. Згодом загиблих учасників акцій протесту почали називати Небесною Сотнею. Слідство досі не встановило, хто стріляв у правоохоронців 18 лютого 2014 року.

Порошенко: ми готові обміняти російських солдатів на Сущенка

Україна готова обміняти російських солдатів на звільнення українського журналіста Романа Сущенка, заарештованого в Москві, заявив президент України Петро Порошенко в інтерв’ю австрійському виданню Profil.

«Ми хочемо повернути наших українців, затриманих у Росії. Вчора (8 лютого – ред.) був день народження Романа Сущенка. Ми готові обміняти російських солдатів, які прийшли в мою країну як вбивці, на Сущенка. Скоро буде чотири роки після затримання Росією відомого режисера Олег Сенцова. Сущенко, Сенцов, багато кримських татар – ми хочемо їх повернути», – заявив Порошенко.

ФСБ Росії затримала Сущенка 30 вересня 2016 року в Москві, назвавши його співробітником української розвідки, який нібито «цілеспрямовано збирав відомості про діяльність збройних сил і військ національної гвардії Росії, що становлять державну таємницю». Кримінальну справу стосовно журналіста порушили за статтею «шпигунство».

Сущенко всі звинувачення відкидає. Українська сторона називає звинувачення проти журналіста безпідставними і вимагає негайно його звільнити.

24 січня Московський міський суд у столиці Росії продовжив арешт Сущенку до 30 березня 2018 року.

Олег Сенцов був затриманий представниками російських спецслужб в Криму в травні 2014 року за звинуваченням в організації терактів на півострові. У серпні 2015 року російський Північно-Кавказький окружний військовий суд у Ростові-на-Дону засудив Сенцова до 20 років колонії суворого режиму за звинуваченням у терористичній діяльності на території Криму. Він не визнав свою провину. Правозахисний центр «Меморіал» вніс Сенцова до списку політв’язнів.

За даними правозахисників, на сьогодні близько 60 громадян України позбавлені волі за політичними мотивами на території Росії і окупованого нею Криму.

71 People Killed in Plane Crash Near Moscow

Russian teams of emergency workers and investigators searched a snow-covered field outside Moscow Monday, looking for body fragments and clues after a plane crashed a day earlier, killing all 71 people on board, including the crew and three children.

The 65 passengers on board were from 5 to 79-years-old, according to a list posted by the Russian Emergencies Ministry, which did not give their nationalities.

More than 400 people and 70 vehicles were deployed to the crash site, the ministry said.

WATCH: Crash

​President Vladimir Putin ordered a special commission to investigate what caused the Antonov AN-148 plane to go down shortly after taking off.

Human error, technical failure and weather conditions are among the several possible cause, according to Russia’s Investigative Committee, which did not mention the possibility of terrorism. 

The regional jet, operated by Saratov Airlines, was traveling from Domodedovo airport, to the city of Orsk in the Orenburg region when it crashed near Argunovo, about 80 kilometers southeast of Moscow.

The seven-year-old plane disappeared from the radar just minutes after departing from the capital city’s second busiest airport and was falling up to 6,700 meters per minute in the last seconds of the crash, flight-tracking site FlightRadar24 reported.

Russian media reported that search crews had found one flight recorder but it is not clear if it is the data or voice recorder.

Putin offered “his profound condolences to those who lost their relatives in the crash,” according to his spokesman Dmitry Peskov.

U.S. President Donald Trump joined world leaders in offering condolences to Putin and the Russian people. “The United States is deeply saddened by the tragic deaths of those on board Saratov Airlines Flight 703. We send our condolences to the families of those who lost their lives and to the people of Russia,” a statement released by the White House said.

The Domodedovo airport has been the focus of security concerns in the past. It came under sharp criticism in 2004, after Chechen suicide bombers destroyed two airliners that took off from the airport on the same evening, killing a total of 90 people. A 2011 bombing in the arrivals area killed 37 people. 

Shabby equipment and poor supervision plagued Russian civil aviation for years after the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union, but the safety record has improved in recent years.

Russia Investigates Passenger Plane Crash Near Moscow

Russian authorities are investigating the cause of a passenger plane crash near Moscow on Sunday. All 71 people on board are thought to have died in the crash. Fragments of the An-148 plane have been found near the village of Stepanovskoye, about 40 kilometers from Moscow’s Domodedovo airport. VOA’s Zlatica Hoke reports weather conditions, pilot error or a technical malfunction are among the possible causes.

British Charities Warned of Funding Cuts, Told to Stamp Out Sexual Exploitation

The British government is warning charities and humanitarian relief organizations that it will withdraw public funding if they fail to establish effective internal reviews to prevent and investigate sexual predatory behavior and abuse by their aid workers. 

The warning came Sunday in the wake of disclosures that one of the country’s biggest charities, Oxfam, failed to disclose its dismissal in 2011 of senior aid workers who paid local prostitutes, some likely under-age, for sex parties in Haiti in the wake of a devastating earthquake that killed more than 200,000 people and left 300,000 injured and 1.5 million homeless.

Four men were fired and three were allowed to resign, including Oxfam’s country director for Haiti. But they were also given references by Oxfam, enabling them to join other aid agencies, despite allegations of sexual exploitation of quake survivors and the downloading of pornography, as well as bullying and intimidation. 

A 2011 internal report that wasn’t made public uncovered “a culture of impunity” and noted, “it cannot be ruled out that any of the prostitutes were under-aged.” 

Oxfam failed to provide full details to Britain’s Charity Commission, a regulatory body, about the probe and what the charity’s critics called an exercise of power over vulnerable people.

And it didn’t inform Haiti’s government — a disclosure that has prompted the Haitian ambassador in London to demand a formal public apology from the aid agency. 

Penny Mordaunt, Britain’s international development minister, condemned Sunday what she described as “horrible behavior” by Oxfam staff in Haiti and said public funding of the charity is now in jeopardy. She has threatened to pull government funding not only from Oxfam but from any British charity that falls below expected standards.

“With regard to Oxfam and any organization that has safeguarding issues, we expect them to cooperate fully, and we will cease to fund any organization that does not,” she said.

Oxfam received $45 million from the British government in 2017 and received more than $200 million in donations from the British public. Now, there are also questions about similar behavior by Oxfam aid workers in Chad more than a decade ago.

“I am affording them the opportunity to tell me in person what they did after these events, and I’m going to be looking to see if they are displaying the moral leadership that I think they need to now,” Mordaunt said in a television interview. “If they do not hand over all the information that they have from their investigation and subsequently to the relevant authorities, including the Charity Commission and prosecuting authorities, then I cannot work with them any more as an aid delivery partner,” she said.

The minister has informed all British charities that receive government funds that they must declare all “safeguarding concerns” or lose funding.

But Mordaunt’s predecessor, Priti Patel, said the government doesn’t have the moral high ground on the issue and fears the problem is more widespread. 

“Predatory pedophiles” have been allowed to exploit the aid sector, she said Sunday. Patel said when she was international development minister, she faced obstruction from her ministerial staff and “internal pushback” when trying to probe exploitation claims against aid workers.

“I did my own research, and I have to say, I had a lot of pushback within my own department. I pushed hard — I had pushback internally, and that is the scandal. The scandal is within the industry, people know about this,” the former minister said, wondering why there were no prosecutions.

Figures analyzed by Britain’s Sunday Times revealed that in the past year alone, more than 120 workers for Britain’s top charities have been accused of sexual abuse, harassment or predatory behavior, mostly while serving overseas.

Oxfam recorded 87 incidents in 2017, of which 53 cases were referred to police or civilian authorities. Save the Children had 31 cases, 10 of which were referred to authorities 

Oxfam has admitted it made an error in failing to make public the Haiti sex scandal and the details of its investigation. Oxfam’s chief executive, Mark Goldring, said the charity is ashamed but has denied it sought to cover up the scandal. 

“What we wanted to do was get on and deliver an aid program,” Golding said. In a radio interview Saturday, he expressed regret for not addressing the issue. 

“With hindsight, I would much prefer we had talked about sexual misconduct,” he said.

Paying for sex is in breach of not only Oxfam’s code of conduct but the United Nations’ codes for the aid workers it funds. Oxfam did announce publicly that there had been misconduct in Haiti and that some staff had been terminated, but it did not reveal the misbehavior to Britain’s Charity Commission. 

Oxfam isn’t alone in scandals involving Haiti. Last year, U.N. peacekeepers in the country were accused of participating in sex rings using food as a lure.

A Save the Children report in 2008 said sex exploitation by aid workers was under-reported generally in countries hit by devastating disasters, man-made or natural. 

“Children as young as six are trading sex with aid workers and peacekeepers for food, money, soap,” the report said. 

Royal Wedding Guess List: Who Gets a Nod from Harry, Meghan?

Forget the Winter Olympics, the Champion’s League or the Super Bowl. The real competition right now is who’s going to be invited to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s wedding.

Everyone who is anyone in Britain is angling for an embossed royal ticket.

British heavyweight boxer Anthony Joshua, who is seeking to add two more world championships to the three he already owns, says he would be happy to interrupt his high-level training for a trip to Windsor Castle on May 19. The ebullient Joshua has not been shy, tweeting a picture of himself and Harry with the question “Need a best man?”

“I’m single,” the 28-year-old told the BBC, expressing an interest in seeing if the elegant, raven-haired Markle’s “got any sisters.”

(For the record Anthony, she has a half sister, 53-year-old Samantha Grant, a divorced mother of three who has called Markle “a social climber.”)

The actual guest list is a closely guarded secret – and details about it may not be released until the event is underway. But that hasn’t stopped speculation about who’s in or who’s out from becoming a national parlor game and the subject of wagers in Britain’s legal betting shops.

 

Any bride and groom run into parental interference in their guest list, whether it’s adding random cousins or forgotten neighbors. Yet Harry and Markle are enduring this phenomenon at a cosmic level due to the royal expectations that come along with being a grandson of Queen Elizabeth II.

At least Harry and Markle won’t face the 3,500 guests that his parents, Prince Charles and Lady Diana Spencer, welcomed to their 1981 “wedding of the century” in St. Paul’s Cathedral in London.They also avoided the warehouse-sized Westminster Abbey, where Harry’s brother Prince William and Kate Middleton packed in 1,900 guests for a 2011 royal wedding extravaganza televised around the world.

 

Their wedding venue, St. George’s Chapel at Windsor Castle, holds a mere 800 guests. Even so, it’s going to be tough to cut that list.

The British royals’ close relatives alone number over 50 – and this time Princess Eugenie gets to bring a plus-one, fiance Jack Brooksbank. Harry also won’t forget non-royals like Kate’s sister, Pippa Middleton, her husband James Mathews, and brother James Middleton.

At William’s wedding, 45 foreign royals from 20 countries were invited from nations as diverse as Spain, Norway, Malaysia, Thailand and Saudi Arabia. William also invited governor generals from Commonwealth countries (23 seats); foreign dignitaries (27); U.K. politicians (42); religious figures (31); senior military officers (14) and 80 workers from charities that he backs. Oh – and don’t forget the ambassadors from countries with ties to Britain.

 

William barely could squeeze in A-listers like David Beckham and TV adventure host Ben Fogle – who may return for Harry’s nuptials.

Britain’s governing elite – Prime Minister Theresa May, Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson and Chancellor of the Exchequer Philip Hammond – would normally expect a Windsor invite. But with turmoil over Brexit roiling the ruling Conservative Party, perhaps the bride and groom should just wait until a week before the wedding, then invite whoever is still left standing.

The juiciest debate has been over invites for rival U.S. presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump. Harry and Obama have obvious chemistry and have worked together promoting Harry’s Invictus Games competition for wounded soldiers. Some British officials, however, fear that an invite to Obama would anger Trump.

 

The royals could note that Obama, the U.S. president in 2011, was not invited to William’s wedding. And they have a bit more leeway because Harry’s wedding is not considered a state event. Markle, meanwhile, is a Hillary Clinton fan.

“We’ve changed our minds on this. We think Harry is in a position that he does not have to worry about the political implications of an invite,” said Rupert Adams, a spokesman for the betting agency William Hill PLC. “We feel strongly that the Obamas will get an invite.”

As for Trump?

 

“We’d be very surprised to see him on the guest list,” Adams said.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has a trifecta of ties to the bride and groom:He’s the head of a Commonwealth country, host of Harry’s latest Invictus Games and leader of the nation where Markle had been living.

 

On the celebrity front, Elton John, who turned his song “Candle in the Wind” into an anthem for the late Princess Diana, is considered a 1-50 lock for an invite (98 percent chance) and singer James Blunt comes in at 1-4. Singer/songwriter Ed Sheeran is also reportedly close to Harry’s royal cousins and his U.K. tour doesn’t start until a few days later.

 

The betting for wedding performer includes John, Sheeran, Coldplay, Joss Stone and Adele.

Violet von Westenholz who introduced the couple will get a nod, along with Harry’s buddies Thomas and Charlie van Straubenzee, Thomas Inskip and Arthur Landon.

 

Yet A-listers could find themselves outnumbered by British military members and charity workers. Look for dress uniforms from both the Blues and Royals regiment and the Army Air Corps, because Harry served as a former Apache helicopter co-pilot in Afghanistan.

“You create significant bonds in a war zone,” noted Adams.

Among the 10 guests that Markle is allowed to pick [just kidding] will be her mom Doria Ragland, dad Thomas, half brother Thomas Jr. and possibly Grant. Markle’s friends include tennis star Serena Williams, stylist Jessica Mulroney, “Suits” star Patrick J. Adams and former “Made in Chelsea” cast member Millie Macintosh.

Markle’s ex-husband, producer Trevor Engelson, is not expected to receive an invitation.

But William Hill spokesman Adams admits that British bookies don’t really have a clue about who the 36-year-old American will invite.

“The simple reality is … we have been focusing on Harry over here,” Adams said.

Лавров звинуватив Україну в «зламі мінських домовленостей»

Україна зробить помилку, якщо остаточно схвалить закон про реінтеграцію Донбасу, заявив в ефірі телеканалу «Россия-1» міністр закордонних справ Росії Сергій Лавров.

«Вважаю, що той, хто зробить перший крок зі зламу мінських домовленостей, зробить колосальну помилку. Власне кажучи, київська влада знаходяться в одному кроці від цієї помилки, якщо вони остаточно ухвалять закон про реінтеграцію, який зараз у них пройшов друге читання», – заявив Лавров в інтерв’ю, показаному державним телебаченням Росії 11 лютого.

Спікер Верховної Ради Андрій Парубій 8 лютого підписав закон про особливості державної політики із забезпечення державного суверенітету України над тимчасово окупованими територіями в Донецькій та Луганській областях, документ передали на підпис президентові Петру Порошенку.

Парламент ухвалив закон «Про особливості державної політики щодо забезпечення державного суверенітету України на тимчасово окупованих територіях в Донецькій і Луганській областях» 18 січня. У документі, серед іншого, міститься пункт про визнання Росії державою-агресором. Дії України в регіоні визначаються як стримування і відсіч російської збройної агресії в Донецькій та Луганській областях на підставі статті 51 Статуту ООН, яка визначає право держав на самооборону. У документі також наголошується, що тимчасова окупація Російською Федерацією територій України незалежно від її тривалості є незаконною і не створює для Росії жодних територіальних прав.

19 січня народні депутати від «Опозиційного блоку» зареєстрували проект постанови про скасування рішення про ухвалення закону, тим самим заблокувавши підписання документа. 6 лютого Верховна Рада України не підтримала внесеного «Опозиційним блоком» проекту постанови.

Міністерство закордонних справ Росії заявляє, що схвалений Верховною Радою закон про реінтеграцію Донбасу суперечить Мінським угодам і загрожує ескалацією на сході України. Українська влада це заперечує.

Violence Affects One in Two Children on Earth

The World Health Organization is calling for resolute action to end violence against children. WHO’s appeal comes in advance of a meeting in Stockholm, Sweden this week that will seek solutions to the problem of violence, which affects one out of every two children on this planet.

The upcoming conference will explore ways to achieve the U.N.’s sustainable development goal of ending violence against children by 2030. But, the statistics weigh heavily against this aspiration.

The World Health Organization reports one half of the two billion children on earth, aged between two and 17, are victims of physical, sexual or emotional violence, or neglect. This violence, it says, occurs in the home behind closed doors or in schools. It involves bullying and violent behavior between young people. It says violence thrives in situations of conflict and other fragile settings.

The ultimate consequence of violence is death. WHO Director of Non-Communicable Diseases, Etienne Krug, says homicide is one of the three leading causes of death for adolescents.

“But, beyond that, there are also for those that survive, which is the vast majority a wide array of health consequences — mental health consequences, depression, anxiety, insomnia, changes in behavior,” he said. “They are more likely to smoke, to drink alcohol, to engage in risky sexual behavior, which leads to HIV, NCDs, etc.”

Krug says violence is not inevitable.It is predictable and preventable. He says the Stockholm conference will consider seven strategies for ending violence against children.

These include the enforcement of laws against this practice, changing norms so violence is no longer acceptable, dealing with aggressive behavior of boys, creating safer environments and teaching young parents how to be good parents.

Russia: All 71 Onboard Killed in Plane Crash

All 71 people aboard a Russian passenger plane were killed when it crashed near Moscow, Russian officials said Sunday.

“Sixty-five passengers and six crew members were on board, and all of them died,” Russia’s office of transport investigations said in a statement.

The seven-year-old plane disappeared from the radar just minutes after departing from the capital city’s second largest airport, Domodedovo and was falling up to 6,700 meters per minute in the last seconds of the crash, flight-tracking site FlightRadar24 reported.

The An-148 regional jet, operated by Saratov Airlines, was traveling from Domodedovo, to the city of Orsk when it crashed near Argunovo, about 80 kilometers southeast of Moscow.

Russian president Vladimir Putin offered “his profound condolences to those who lost their relatives in the crash,” his spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.

The crash site was covered in heavy snow, delaying access to the area as rescue workers had to park their cars and travel to the crash site on foot.

The cause of the crash is currently unknown, though Russia’s transport ministry said it is investigating bad weather and human error as possible explanations.

 

 

 

 

Who’s at Fault in Amtrak Crash? Amtrak Pays Regardless

Federal investigators are still looking at how CSX railway crews routed an Amtrak train into a parked freight train in Cayce, South Carolina, last weekend. But even if CSX should bear sole responsibility for the accident, Amtrak will likely end up paying crash victims’ legal claims with public money.

Amtrak pays for accidents it didn’t cause because of secretive agreements negotiated between the passenger rail company, which receives more than $1 billion annually in federal subsidies, and the private railroads, which own 97 percent of the tracks on which Amtrak travels.

Both Amtrak and freight railroads that own the tracks fight to keep those contracts secret in legal proceedings. But whatever the precise legal language, plaintiffs’ lawyers and former Amtrak officials say Amtrak generally bears the full cost of damages to its trains, passengers, employees and other crash victims — even in instances where crashes occurred as the result of a freight rail company’s negligence or misconduct.

​No ‘iron in the fire’

Railroad industry advocates say that freight railways have ample incentive to keep their tracks safe for their employees, customers and investors. But the Surface Transportation Board and even some federal courts have long concluded that allowing railroads to escape liability for gross negligence is bad public policy.

“The freight railroads don’t have an iron in the fire when it comes to making the safety improvements necessary to protect members of the public,” said Bob Pottroff, a Manhattan, Kansas, rail injury attorney who has sued CSX on behalf of an injured passenger from the Cayce crash. “They’re not paying the damages.”

Beyond CSX’s specific activities in the hours before the accident, the company’s safety record has deteriorated in recent years, according to a standard metric provided by the Federal Railroad Administration. Since 2013, CSX’s rate of major accidents per million miles traveled has jumped by more than half, from 2 to 3.08 — significantly worse than the industry average. And rail passenger advocates raised concerns after the CSX CEO at the time pushed hard last year to route freight more directly by altering its routes.

CSX denied that safety had slipped at the company, blaming the change in the major accident index on a reduction of total miles traveled combined with changes in its cargo and train length.

“Our goal remains zero accidents,” CSX spokesman Bryan Tucker wrote in a statement provided to The Associated Press. CSX’s new system of train routing “will create a safer, more efficient railroad resulting in a better service product for our customers,” he wrote.

Amtrak’s ability to offer national rail service is governed by separately negotiated track usage agreements with 30 different railroads. All the deals share a common trait: They’re “no fault,” according to a September 2017 presentation delivered by Amtrak executive Jim Blair as part of a Federal Highway Administration seminar.

No fault means Amtrak takes full responsibility for its property and passengers and the injuries of anyone hit by a train. The “host railroad” that operates the tracks must only be responsible for its property and employees. Blair called the decades-long arrangement “a good way for Amtrak and the host partners to work together to get things resolved quickly and not fight over issues of responsibility.”

Amtrak declined to comment on Blair’s presentation. But Amtrak’s history of not pursuing liability claims against freight railroads doesn’t fit well with federal officials and courts’ past declarations that the railroads should be held accountable for gross negligence and willful misconduct.

​Maryland crash, backlash

After a 1987 crash in Chase, Maryland, in which a Conrail train crew smoked marijuana then drove a train with disabled safety features past multiple stop signals and into an Amtrak train — killing 16 — a federal judge ruled that forcing Amtrak to take financial responsibility for “reckless, wanton, willful, or grossly negligent acts by Conrail” was contrary to good public policy.

Conrail paid. But instead of taking on more responsibility going forward, railroads went in the opposite direction, recalls a former Amtrak board member who spoke to the AP. After Conrail was held responsible in the Chase crash, he said, Amtrak got “a lot of threats from the other railroads.”

The former board member requested anonymity because he said that Amtrak’s internal legal discussions were supposed to remain confidential and he did not wish to harm his own business relationships by airing a contentious issue.

Because Amtrak operates on the freight railroads’ tracks and relies on the railroads’ dispatchers to get passenger trains to their destinations on time, Amtrak executives concluded they couldn’t afford to pick a fight, the former Amtrak board member said.

“The law says that Amtrak is guaranteed access” to freights’ tracks, he said. “But it’s up to the goodwill of the railroad as to whether they’ll put you ahead or behind a long freight train.”

A 2004 New York Times series on train crossing safety drew attention to avoidable accidents at railroad crossings and involving passenger trains — and to railroads’ ability to shirk financial responsibility for passenger accidents. In the wake of the reporting, the Surface Transportation Board ruled that railroads “cannot be indemnified for its own gross negligence, recklessness, willful or wanton misconduct,” according to a 2010 letter by then-Surface Transportation Board chairman Dan Elliott to members of Congress.

That ruling gives Amtrak grounds to pursue gross negligence claims against freight railroads — if it wanted to.

“If Amtrak felt that if they didn’t want to pay, they’d have to litigate it,” said Elliott, now an attorney at Conner & Winters.

Same lawyers

The AP was unable to find an instance where the railroad has brought such a claim against a freight railroad since the 1987 Chase, Maryland, disaster. The AP also asked Amtrak, CSX and the Association of American Railroads to identify any example within the last decade of a railroad contributing to a settlement or judgment in a passenger rail accident that occurred on its track. All entities declined to provide such an example.

Even in court cases where establishing gross negligence by a freight railroad is possible, said Potrroff, the plaintiff’s attorney, he has never seen any indication that the railroad and Amtrak are at odds.

“You’ll frequently see Amtrak hire the same lawyers the freight railroads use,” he said.

Ron Goldman, a California plaintiff attorney who has also represented passenger rail accident victims, agreed. While Goldman’s sole duty is to get the best possible settlement for his client, he said he’d long been curious about whether it was Amtrak or freight railroads which ended up paying for settlements and judgments.

“The question of how they share that liability is cloaked in secrecy,” he said, adding: “The money is coming from Amtrak when our clients get the check.”

Pottroff said he has long wanted Amtrak to stand up to the freight railroads on liability matters. Not only would it make safety a bigger financial consideration for railroads, he said, it would simply be fair.

“Amtrak has a beautiful defense — the freight railroad is in control of all the infrastructure,” he said. But he’s not expecting Amtrak to use it during litigation over the Cayce crash.

“Amtrak always pays,” he said.

Oxfam Faces New Investigation Over Haiti Prostitutes Scandal

Britain’s Charity Commission must conduct a “full and urgent investigation” into Oxfam following an alleged cover-up of its staff hiring prostitutes in Haiti during a 2011 relief effort on the earthquake-hit island, the prime minister’s office said Saturday.

“The reports of what is unacceptable behavior by senior aid workers in Haiti are truly shocking,” a spokeswoman for Theresa May said. “We want to see Oxfam provide all the evidence they hold of the events to the Charity Commission for a full and urgent investigation of these very serious allegations.”

The call came as the British charities regulator released its own statement detailing Oxfam’s previous disclosure of the events, including that it characterized the misconduct as “inappropriate sexual behavior.”

“Our approach to this matter would have been different had the full details that have been reported been disclosed to us at the time,” the commission said.

It confirmed that it had asked Oxfam to urgently provide fresh information.

Late on Friday, the Department for International Development (DFID) also said it was reviewing its relationship with the U.K.-based charity, to which it gave nearly $44 million last year.

It said Oxfam’s leaders had “showed a lack of judgment” in their handling of the matter and their level of openness with the government and Charity Commission.

‘Appalling abuse’

“The international development secretary is reviewing our current work with Oxfam and has requested a meeting with the senior team at the earliest opportunity,” a DFID spokeswoman said. “The way this appalling abuse of vulnerable people was dealt with raises serious questions that Oxfam must answer.”

Oxfam Chief Executive Mark Goldring said Saturday that the charity receives less than 10 percent of its funding from DFID and hoped to continue working with the department while rebuilding trust with the public. 

He admitted Oxfam did not give full details of the scandal to the commission in 2011 but insisted it “did anything but cover it up.”

“With hindsight, I would much prefer that we had talked about [the] sexual misconduct,” Goldring told BBC radio. “But I don’t think it was in anyone’s best interest to be describing the details of the behavior in a way that was actually going to draw extreme attention to it.”

The charity is under growing pressure after an investigation by The Times found young sex workers had been hired by senior staff in Haiti after the 2010 earthquake. Groups of young prostitutes were invited to homes and guesthouses paid for by the charity for sex parties, according to one source who claimed to have seen footage of an orgy with sex workers wearing Oxfam T-shirts.

In further revelations Friday, the paper said Oxfam failed to warn other aid agencies about the staff involved, which allowed them to get jobs among vulnerable people in other disaster areas.

Roland van Hauwermeiren, 68, whom Oxfam said was forced to resign as Haiti country director in 2011 after allegedly admitting hiring prostitutes, went on to become head of mission for Action Against Hunger in Bangladesh from 2012 to 2014.

Good references received

The French charity told AFP it made pre-employment checks with Oxfam but that the U.K.-based organization “did not share with us the reasons for his resignation as head of mission in Haiti or the results of its internal inquiry.”

“Moreover we received positive references from former Oxfam staff — in their individual capacities — who worked with him,” including from a human resources staffer, a spokesman said.

In a statement, Oxfam denied providing positive references for those implicated.

It said the vast number of aid operations working around the globe made it impossible “to ensure that those found guilty of sexual misconduct were not re-employed in the sector.”

“Unfortunately, there is nothing we can do to stop individuals falsifying references, getting others that were dismissed to act as referees and claiming it was a reference from Oxfam,” a spokeswoman added.

And there was also nothing to stop them from getting former or current staff to provide a reference “in a personal capacity,” she said.

The charity said it launched an immediate investigation in 2011 that found a “culture of impunity” among some staff, but it denied trying to cover up the scandal.

During the probe, Oxfam dismissed four staff members and another three resigned, including van Hauwermeiren.

The charity also said it had yet to find evidence proving allegations that underage girls were involved.

Merkel Declines to Comment on Poland’s New Holocaust Law

German Chancellor Angela Merkel declined to comment Saturday on a Polish law that imposes jail terms for suggesting the country was complicit in the Holocaust, saying she did not want to wade into Poland’s internal affairs.

The law would impose prison sentences of up to three years for using the phrase “Polish death camps” and for suggesting “publicly and against the facts” that the Polish nation or state was complicit in Nazi Germany’s crimes.

“Without directly interfering in the legislation in Poland, I would like to say the following very clearly as German chancellor: We as Germans are responsible for what happened during the Holocaust, the Shoah, under National Socialism [Nazism],” Merkel said in her weekly video podcast.

She was responding to a question from a student who had asked whether the new Polish law curbs freedom of expression. Israel and the United States criticized President Andrzej Duda for signing the bill into law this week.

Israel says the law will curb free speech, criminalize basic historical facts and stop any discussion of the role some Poles played in Nazi crimes.

A Polish government spokeswoman welcomed Merkel’s remarks, the PAP news agency reported. Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki will hold talks with Merkel in Berlin next week.

Poland’s ruling Law and Justice party has clashed with the European Union and human rights groups on a range of issues since taking power in late 2015. It says the law is needed to ensure that Poles are recognized as victims, not perpetrators, of Nazi aggression in World War II.

More than 3 million of the 3.2 million Jews who lived in pre-war Poland were killed by the Nazis, accounting for about half of all Jews killed in the Holocaust.

Jews from across the continent were sent to be killed at death camps built and operated by Germans in occupied Poland — home to Europe’s biggest Jewish community at the time.

Winter Olympics Debut A 10th-Anniversary Gift For Kosovo

Skier Albin Tahiri will miss Kosovo’s 10th-anniversary celebrations next week — but as the country’s first winter Olympian, he thinks his 1.8 million compatriots will forgive him while he competes in the Pyeongchang Games that began Friday.

While it has long had snow-capped mountains offering steep slopes and deep powder, Kosovo didn’t exist as a country until it broke free from Serbia in 2008, nearly a decade after a NATO-led bombing campaign pushed out Serbian forces to end a brutal crackdown on ethnic Albanians during a two-year battle for independence.

Now the 28-year-old Tahiri will compete in all five alpine-ski events in South Korea, one of 115 countries that recognize Kosovo as a country.

“When I started skiing, Kosovo was not an independent country,” says the Slovenian-born Tahiri, who carried Kosovo’s flag into the Olympic Stadium during the opening ceremonies.

“My father always cheered for Kosovar athletes and I did it as well, so when Kosovo proclaimed independence I wanted to help by representing the country as an athlete,” he adds. 

Kosovo’s inclusion in the Olympics was not always a given.

Serbia lobbied hard to block Kosovo from being recognized as a separate Olympic country and it wasn’t until the International Olympic Committee granted such a status to Kosovo in late 2014 that it made its debut at the Summer Olympics two years later in Brazil, which still does not formally recognize Kosovo as an independent country.

Tahiri, who began skiing in Slovenia at the age of 7, collected enough World Cup points while studying dentistry.

Now given the chance to represent Kosovo, the birthplace of his father, Tahiri will have to compete against the world’s best skiers without access to a full-time equipment manager or his coach — who can’t travel with him to South Korea because of the cost.

‘Once-In-A-Lifetime Pressure’

With the lighting of the flame in Pyeongchang, Kosovo will be one of six countries competing in the Winter Olympics for the first time.

The young country officially marks its independence on Feb. 17, midway through the Olympics, which finish eight days later.

“For me as president of the country, for the state and Kosovar society, as well as for the whole world, the participation of Kosovo for the first time in the Olympic Winter Games in [South] Korea is [big] news,” Hashim Thaci, president of Kosovo, said on Feb. 5, during a ceremony presenting the official Kosovar flag to Tahiri.

“I hope that not only the participation [of Tahiri] will make news, but that we will also have the strong news of winning a medal,” Thaci added.

Thaci and the rest of the country still have the Rio Olympics fresh in their minds. That debut by Kosovo put the country on the sporting map as Majlinda Kelmendi made history by winning a gold medal in judo.

Kelmendi says she is proud that Kosovo will finally be represented in the Winter Olympics, and knows the pressure Tahiri faces as the hopes of a nation weigh on him as he glides down the slopes.

“I wish him all the best,” Kelmendi said in a Thursday Facebook video post. “I know you have responsibility, you will also be waving the flag, but enjoy this experience to the maximum. Believe me, it’s something that happens once in a lifetime, so all the best and feel proud for the country you represent,” she added.

RFE/RL’s Balkan Service contributed to this report.

У Дніпрі відбулися громадські слухання про перейменування області на Січеславську

У Дніпрі відбулося громадське обговорення ініціативи перейменування Дніпропетровської області на Січеславську.

Захід організував обласний осередок Всеукраїнського товариства «Просвіта».

За словами організаторів події, нинішня назва області – Дніпропетровська – підпадає під закон про декомунізацію і має бути змінена.

Презентуючи обґрунтування щодо ініціативи з перейменування області на Січеславську, доповідачі зазначали, що саме ця назва апелює до козацького минулого: на території області існували п’ять із восьми січей (усі головні козацькі січі – Томаківська, Микитинська, Базавлуцька, Чортомлицька, Підпільненська). Також Дніпропетровська область є єдиною, територія якої повністю була територією запорозьких вольностей.

За часів УНР край мав назву земля Січ з центром у Катеринославі, а у 1918-1919 роках місто носило неофіційну назву Січеслав (Січослав).

Історик і краєзнавець Микола Чабан презентував учасникам заходу раритетні видання сторічної давнини, де місцем друку зазначений Січеслав, серед яких і рідкісний шевченківський Кобзар.

Як зауважували учасники, публічне відродження назви «Січеслав» розпочалось незадовго до розпаду СРСР: національно-демократичні організації області стали використовувати в своїх назвах це слово, проте 2016 року прихильникам назви «забракло підтримки», аби домогтись саме такого перейменування обласного центру.

«Битву за Січеслав ми програли, битву за Січеславську область ми не маємо програти», – зауважували учасники зібрання.

У громадському обговоренні взяли участь як прихильники впровадження назви Січеславська область, так і опоненти цієї ініціативи. Останні, зокрема, зауважували, що запорозькі козаки «ніколи не називали себе січеславцями».

Учасники обговорення визнали, що попри те, що назва Січеслав використовується мешканцями, для багатьох ставлення до цього топоніму залишається неоднозначним. Також, за їхніми словами, може бути проблематичним затвердження назви «Січеславська область» у парламенті, адже за неї мають висловитись не менш як 300 депутатів.

Минулого тижня правозахисник з Дніпра Дмитро Рева зареєстрував електрону петицію до президента України щодо перейменування Дніпропетровської області на Січеславську. Він просить президента ініціювати розгляду Верховною Радою України питання внесення змін в Конституцію про перейменування області. Для розгляду петиції президентом вона має набрати 25 тисяч голосів. Цю ініціативу підтримала низка громадських організацій.

19 травня 2016 року Верховна Рада перейменувала місто Дніпропетровськ на Дніпро. За відповідний проект постанови проголосували 247 народних депутатів. Рішення ухвалено на виконання закону про декомунізацію.

Понад 4 мільйони українців їздили до Росії у 2017 році – Державна служба статистики

Близько 4,3 мільйона українців їздили до Росії у 2017 році, свідчать дані Державної служби статистики.

Більше українці виїжджали до Польщі. Згідно зі статистикою, кордон у напрямку цієї країни перетнули майже 10 мільйонів громадян України.

Крім того, 3,1 мільйона українців їздили до Угорщини.

11 червня 2017 року набрала чинності візова лібералізація для українців при короткотермінових подорожах до країн ЄС і «шенгену» (до 90 днів протягом кожних 180 днів без права працевлаштування). Безвізовий режим стосується всіх держав-членів Європейського союзу, крім Великої Британії й Ірландії, а також країн «шенгенської зони» з-поза меж ЄС. Цей режим наразі не стосується так званих «заморських володінь» Нідерландів і Франції.

У 2017 році Україну відвідали понад 14 мільйонів іноземців – Державна служба статистики

У 2017 році Україну відвідали понад 14,2 мільйона іноземців. Про це свідчать дані Державної служби статистики.

З них майже 89 тисяч іноземних громадян прибули до України в службових, ділових та дипломатичних цілях, майже 39 тисяч – у туристичних, понад 13,7 мільйона – у приватних, майже 349 тисяч – у межах культурного та спортивного обміну, релігійних цілях та інших.

Згідно зі статистикою, найбільше до України прибували громадяни Молдови (понад 4,4 мільйона), Білорусі (понад 2,7 мільйона) та Росії (майже 1,5 мільйона).

Pictures Are Worth 10,000 Words

A new vocabulary program claims to dramatically accelerate a child’s understanding of language. As Faith Lapidus reports, the Mrs Wordsmith teaching system relies on cartoon drawings and short word exercises to boost academic achievement.

Experts: More Stock Volatility Ahead, but No Reason to Panic

It’s been a tough week on Wall Street. The Dow Jones Industrial average closed more than 300 points higher Friday, after plunging more than 1,000 points the day before, the second steepest decline in history. The biggest dive happened Monday when the blue chip index fell more than 1,100 points. It’s enough to make even the most experienced investors swoon. But does this mean the end of the nine-year bull market? Is it time to worry? Mil Arcega spoke with economic analysts to get some answers.

Ride-Sharing Uber and Self-Driving Car Firm Waymo Settle Legal Battle

Ride-sharing giant Uber and the self-driving car company Waymo have agreed to settle their legal battle over allegedly stolen trade secrets.

The surprise agreement Friday came as lawyers for the companies prepared to wrap up the first week of the case’s jury trial in San Francisco, California.

As part of the agreement, Uber will pay $245 million worth of its own shares to Waymo.

Waymo sued Uber last year, saying that one of its former engineers who later became the head of Uber’s self-driving car project took with him thousands of confidential documents.

After the lawsuit was filed, Uber fired the employee and fell behind on its plans to roll out self-driving cars in its ride-sharing service.

Waymo, a company hatched from Google, says the settlement also includes an agreement that Uber cannot use Waymo confidential information in its technology.

“We have reached an agreement with Uber that we believe will protect Waymo’s intellectual property now and into the future. We are committed to working with Uber to make sure that each company develops its own technology,” Waymo said in a statement.

Uber’s new CEO, Dara Khosrowshahi, expressed regret for the company’s actions in a statement Friday.

“While we do not believe that any trade secrets made their way from Waymo to Uber, nor do we believe that Uber has used any of Waymo’s proprietary information in its self-driving technology, we are taking steps with Waymo to ensure our Lidar and software represents just our good work,” Khosrowshahi said in a statement.

Lidar is a laser-based system that helps self-driving cars to navigate their surroundings.

The trial so far included testimony from former Uber chief executive Travis Kalanick, who denied any attempt to steal trade secrets from Waymo.

Uber has faced a series of recent struggles, including public accusations of sexual harassment at the company and accusations it used software to thwart government regulators.

Клімкін: рішення ЄСПЛ стосовно Афанасьєва викликає дуже змішані почуття

Рішення Європейського суду справ людини у справі українця Геннадія Афанасьєва проти Росії викликає «дуже змішані почуття», заявив міністр закордонних справ України Павло Клімкін у Twitter. ЄСПЛ зобов’язав Москву виплатити Афанасьєву дві тисячі євро.

«Ніколи не обговорював рішення ЄСПЛ, та стосовно справи Афанасьєва маю дуже змішані почуття. З одного боку, засуджуються дії Росії – і цей голос лунає на весь світ. З іншого – усі тортури оцінюються у дві тисячі євро. Кожне ганебне порушення Росією прав людини має закінчуватися суворим судовим вироком», – написав Клімкін.

8 лютого Європейський суд з прав людини задовольнив дві скарги захисту Афанасьєва на умови перевезень у тюремних транспортних засобах Федеральної служби з виконання покарань Росії і присудив йому грошові компенсації.

Афанасьєв заявив, що його захист готує ще дві скарги проти Росії в ЄСПЛ.

Раніше Афанасьєв розповідав про тортури і побої в російському ув’язненні. Геннадій Афанасьєв стверджує, що його під тортурами змусили обмовити інших кримчан – Олега Сенцова і Олександра Кольченка, яких в Росії засудили на 20 і 10 років колонії відповідно.

У грудні 2014 року Московський міськсуд засудив Афанасьєва до семи років позбавлення волі з відбуванням покарання в колонії суворого режиму за звинуваченням в «тероризмі».

Геннадій Афанасьєв і ще один українець Юрій Солошенко повернулися в Україну з російського ув’язнення 14 червня 2016 року. Їх обміняли на одеситів-представників ЗМІ – Олену Гліщинську і Віталія Діденка, яких звинувачують в сепаратизмі. Вони були серед організаторів і активних учасників так званої «Народної ради Бессарабії».